Have you any idea there is a declaring called “the Law can be an ass”? It is produced from an English proverb which usually likens the law’s stubbornness and stupidity for the supposed innate nature of your donkey. Charles Dickens popularised that in his novel “Oliver Twist” in which Mr. Bumble is told in the court regarding his domineering better half that “… the law supposes your wife acts under the direction”, replies:
“If regulations supposes that, ” mentioned Mr. Bumble, squeezing his hat emphatically in your hands, “the law is a great ass – an idiot”.
Within my mind, the law becomes an ass as the judges, lawyers, and the legal profession usually do not follow the spirit with the law. They are only focused on the letter of regulations.
Our politicians are great at making new laws on a regular basis because it gives them the looks of acting positive and wanting to solve a problem. In this, they do not allow for the fact when the lawyers and judges apply regulations, only the letter with the law is followed rather than the spirit. It leads to contradiction most of the time where all the moral and moral considerations are usually lost. Thus the legislation becomes an ass.
We see this doing his thing in every bureaucratic institution everywhere and in any way levels of government. It indicates that those working because situation are not allowed to use their common sense or reason making use of their brains. These people are increasingly being conditioned to think in the particular way and trained to follow the letter of regulations. Do you realise that whenever one is working beneath these conditions unless one knows it, one unwittingly will become a zombie?
In the particular recent case of Isreal Folau and also Rugby Australia, a moral and moral dilemma has arisen due to the fact both sides have claimed their correctness in line with the letter of the legislation.
Israel Folau claims which he has been discriminated in opposition to and unfairly sacked by Rugby Australia as a result of his religious beliefs.
Since Rugby Australia can be a bureaucratic organisation which can only think with regards to the letter of regulations, they had to locate Folau in breach regarding contract to sack your pet. There was no other option since they followed the letter with the law.
To implement regulations, Rugby Australia did just what most bureaucratic organisations carry out, display their authority and also use bullying tactics. They warned Folau and also threatened him with dismissal in order that he may bow with their demands. Under those situations, how would you feel in the event you were in Folau’s place? Would you not dig within your heels?
Thus we provide an example where the letter with the law is applied, without the ethical and moral consideration to a individual who had not necessarily committed any crime, to produce him submit to their particular demands.
Recently in the particular Brisbane Courier-Mail of 7 May well 2019, there was a written report titled “Music legend sensed ‘violated'” published. Diana Ross “was near tears as a safety officer felt between the girl legs during an international airport pat-down”. “I was taken care of like s.. t”. “Makes me desire to cry. ” “It’s not the thing that was done, but how, inches she insisted. “However, a TSA spokesman mentioned that CCTV footage did actually show the officers required ‘correctly’ followed all protocols”.
The following again, was an example regarding how bureaucratic handling of a situation may result in traumatising an individual. And lastly, the bureaucracy always goes scotfree since they always act within the letter with the law. Under the protection with the law, an average person subconsciously or consciously will feel more powerful and also superior; thus, there can be a likelihood of authority getting abused.